Here it comes. This is what you get from a wildly out of control Federal Government. This is how we lose our liberty. We did not elect these people to tell us what to eat at lunch. They will invite themselves into every detail of our lives as long as we continue to allow government to expand. There may be wisdom in making better choices at lunch but that is not an appropriate function of the Federal Government. In my own experience, you could not buy a candy bar from a vending machine even in high school. You could get a crisp apple which were big sellers. I have no idea when school policies changed but student nutrition is a matter best left between parents and their respective school districts. What is most serious is that it is not a stretch to get from from federal dictates on menu items at lunch to federal dictates on healthcare choices and procedures and ultimately who will be able to have those procedures. If we stay on this path, no one will like the destination.
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Covered Bridge Bicycle Classic
Hats off to my Son-in-Law, Jeff. He recruited me to ride with him in this event out of the unlikely town of Snelling, California, 30 miles east of the 99 Hwy and deep in almond and grape growing country. It was a little cool and breezy but the rest stop's chicken soup (never had this on a ride before) provided some warmth as we refueled. You might be able to tell from Jeff's attire that he is not exactly a bicycling enthusiast. But he is game for a good cause and part of a generation that is distinguishing itself for efforts devoted to something larger than themselves. Perhaps my experience is unique since my youngest son is also in the non-profit sector but I don't think so and I'm challenged by it. Check out Lifewind and Invisible Children.Sunday, March 8, 2009
Healthcare Reform?
Any discussion about healthcare in the U.S. ought to begin with a recognition of two undeniable facts - the U.S. has the finest healthcare system in the world and the vast majority of U.S. citizens are pleased with their healthcare. This does not suggest that improvements are not needed but people come from all over the world to get care in the U.S. and that alone ought to draw our focused attention when public debate turns to fixing a "healthcare crisis" and politicians seek to make "bold change". Just what are they wanting to fix and more importantly, what is the real root cause they are seeking to address? I submit that the vast majority of our elected representatives have little real understanding of the former and are mostly ignorant about the latter. We should expect more and they should be doing better.
Today Dr. Z runs a radiation clinic. He is responsible for the cost of his state of the art linear accelerator in his office, the lease on his building and the wages of his support staff. It is in the economic interest of Dr. Z to treat you. There are also other Dr.'s out there like Dr. Z and you have some choice about which Dr. to go to so the market tends to control the cost of treatment. You have a high probability of getting treated. If that same remedy is now controlled by the government, then the only point of cost control is in how many radiation treatments the government can afford. This could mean several things - a longer wait to get into a treatment program, maybe 3 radiation visits when you really need 6, maybe no radiation treatments because you are over the age of 70 or perhaps as in another type of medical care, a 10 month waiting list for prenatal care. The only point of cost control is you. It is in the economic interest of the government not to treat you. Healthcare isn't reformed. It's rationed - rationed like it is in every other country in the world where healthcare is run by the government. Be aware of any government representative that says their program will lower the cost of healthcare. Be very aware.
Friday, March 6, 2009
My Wife's Oatmeal
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)